lindsay vickery
  • lv
  • music
    • listen
    • Works by Instrumentation
    • Works by Concept
    • 2014 onwards >
      • music 2022
      • music 2021
      • music2020
      • music2019
      • music 2018
      • music 2017
      • music 2016
      • music 2015
      • music 2014
    • music 2009-2013 >
      • music 2013
      • music 2012
      • music 2011
      • music 2010
      • music 2009
    • music 1997-2008 >
      • music 2004-8
      • music 2003
      • music 2002
      • music 2001
      • music 2000
      • music 1998-9
      • music 1997
    • music 1985-1996 >
      • music 1995-6
      • music 1993-4
      • music 1991-92
      • music 1988-90
      • music 1985-87
  • writing
    • Research Projects >
      • screening the score >
        • scrolling notation
        • rhizomatic scores
      • expanded music notation
      • realtime notation
      • scoring field recordings
      • spectral analysis as a compositional tool
      • computer controlled performance environment
    • research >
      • research 2021
      • research 2020
      • research 2019
      • research 2018
      • research 2017
      • research 2016
      • research 2015
      • research 2014
      • research 2013
      • research 2011-12
      • research 2008-10
      • research 2001-04
    • teXts
    • presentations
  • performance
    • performance 2017- >
      • performance 2022
      • performance 2021
      • performance 2020
      • performance 2019
      • performance 2018
      • performance 2017
    • performance 2009-16 >
      • performance 2016
      • performance 2015
      • performance 2014
      • performance 2013
      • performance 2012
      • performance 2011
      • performance 2010
      • performance 2009
    • performance 1997-2008 >
      • performance 2005-8
      • performance 2004
      • performance 2003
      • performance 2002
      • performance 2001
      • performance 2000
      • performance 1999
      • performance 1998
      • performance 1997
    • performance 1985-1996 >
      • performance 1992-6
      • performance to 1991
    • solo performance
  • gallery
    • scoreplayerscores
    • environmental scores
    • nature forms
    • landscapes
    • graphic scores
    • schematics
    • spectrograms
    • oddities
  • POI
  • Blog
  • Blag

The approach to Score Generation in Semantics of Redaction

12/3/2015

0 Comments

 
The notation for SoR (Image left) is principally created by using accents detected in a speech recording in real-time to generate graphical symbols of varying vertical position, size and colour, determined by the frequency, amplitude and timbre of the recording at the accent point.
Analysis of the recording is derived from Tristan Jehan’s analyzer~ object, using attack, frequency, amplitude, brightness and noisiness data. The flow of analysis data is captured at the point of each detected attack (See Figure 2). By default the values defining an attack are an increase in the incoming signal of +10db in a period less than 100ms, however the performer may alter these values to achieve a better score/visualisation result.
Picture
The opening section of The Semantics of Redaction [2014].
Picture
The flow of analysis data is captured at the point of each detected attack.
The data is mapped in the following manner:
Frequency: Vertical height and notehead colour hue
  • Amplitude: Notehead size
  • Brightness: Notehead colour saturation 
  • Noisiness: Notehead colour luminance 
The data is drawn to MaxMSP’s jit.lcd object using the standard paintrect command (see Figure 3). A stem is also drawn on the left side of the notehead above a central “beam”. The left side stem is used regardless of whether the notehead is above or below the beam as an aid to visualising the precise onset of the accent and therefore performer’s note execution.
Because of the variation of the acoustic characteristics of potential recordings and performer preferences, an analysis window allows the performer to scale incoming data. Scaling changes may be necessary because of variations in the average frequency of the speaking voice or ambient noise in the recording. From the performer’s perspective the attack rate and sensitivity values create changes in the density number of note events in the score. 
The analysis window provides the performer with “peak”, “trough” and “mean” values for each of the analysis parameters from the recording, as well as a graphical display showing the most recent 100 values for each parameter. A swatch graphically displays the variations in notehead colours. A preset object allows the performer to save the chosen scalings for each new recording.
Picture
Data is drawn to MaxMSP’s jit.lcd object using the standard paintrect command.
Picture
Analysis window (detail) performer-variable scaling values.
Although it would be possible to automate the scaling process, allowing the performer to set the values provides a means to individualise the score that is generated. For example to achieve variations in the number of noteheads that fall in different “registers”.
Unlike Lyrebird, which has a range of colour interpolations and generates a spectrogram-like score, only five hues (Yellow, Orange, Red, Green and Blue) are used in SoR (although there is continuous variation in the saturation and luminance of each colour). This approach was taken to achieve a clear differentiation between five registers in the score which are conceived as instrument groups by the percussionist: for example ranging from yellow (high-pitched instruments) to blue (low-pitched instruments). The notehead size is intended to correlate to the performer’s dynamic range.
Picture
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    lindsay vickery

    test version

    Categories

    All

    Archives

    September 2020
    October 2019
    September 2018
    August 2018
    March 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    May 2016
    April 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly