lindsay vickery
  • lv
  • music
    • listen
    • Works by Instrumentation
    • Works by Concept
    • 2014 onwards >
      • music 2022
      • music 2021
      • music2020
      • music2019
      • music 2018
      • music 2017
      • music 2016
      • music 2015
      • music 2014
    • music 2009-2013 >
      • music 2013
      • music 2012
      • music 2011
      • music 2010
      • music 2009
    • music 1997-2008 >
      • music 2004-8
      • music 2003
      • music 2002
      • music 2001
      • music 2000
      • music 1998-9
      • music 1997
    • music 1985-1996 >
      • music 1995-6
      • music 1993-4
      • music 1991-92
      • music 1988-90
      • music 1985-87
  • writing
    • Research Projects >
      • screening the score >
        • scrolling notation
        • rhizomatic scores
      • expanded music notation
      • realtime notation
      • scoring field recordings
      • spectral analysis as a compositional tool
      • computer controlled performance environment
    • research >
      • research 2021
      • research 2020
      • research 2019
      • research 2018
      • research 2017
      • research 2016
      • research 2015
      • research 2014
      • research 2013
      • research 2011-12
      • research 2008-10
      • research 2001-04
    • teXts
    • presentations
  • performance
    • performance 2017- >
      • performance 2022
      • performance 2021
      • performance 2020
      • performance 2019
      • performance 2018
      • performance 2017
    • performance 2009-16 >
      • performance 2016
      • performance 2015
      • performance 2014
      • performance 2013
      • performance 2012
      • performance 2011
      • performance 2010
      • performance 2009
    • performance 1997-2008 >
      • performance 2005-8
      • performance 2004
      • performance 2003
      • performance 2002
      • performance 2001
      • performance 2000
      • performance 1999
      • performance 1998
      • performance 1997
    • performance 1985-1996 >
      • performance 1992-6
      • performance to 1991
    • solo performance
  • gallery
    • scoreplayerscores
    • environmental scores
    • nature forms
    • landscapes
    • graphic scores
    • schematics
    • spectrograms
    • oddities
  • POI
  • Blog
  • Blag

Scrolling Rates

29/4/2014

1 Comment

 
Picture
What  is a “normal” (or at least average) reading rate for a score and how does the rate impact upon the amount of sonic detail that is capable of being represented? The table below compares the notional average rate at which the score progresses as the performer reads the work: its “scroll-rate”. The scroll-rate is calculated by dividing the length of the score by its average duration. 
The works are varied: Beethoven Piano Sonata No. 17 in D minor Op. 31 No. 2 (1802) (The Tempest) first movement includes significant changes of tempo in which the performer would be reading at different rates; the Chopin Waltz in D-flat major Op. 64 No. 1 (1847) (Minute Waltz), Ravel Pavane pour une infante défunte  (1899), Debussy Voiles (1909) might be considered examples at the high, low and centre of the scroll-rate speeds. These rates give an indication of what is an acceptable and perhaps even conventional speed to read musical notation. 
The final five works on the table are “scrolling scores” by Cat Hope and Lindsay Vickery, in which the score moves past the performer at a constant rate on an iPad screen. There is, at the least, a psychological distinction between this paradigm, where the performer is forced to view only a portion of the score at any time, and the fixed score where the performer directs their own gaze. 
The scrolling score, although highly useful for synchronising musical events in non-metrical music has particular natural constraints based on the limitations of human visual processing: at scroll rates greater than 3 cm/s the reader struggles to capture information; information dense musical notation may significantly lower this threshold; reading representations of fine metrical structures in a scrolling medium is problematic. The problem may be caused by a conflict between the continuous movement of the score and the relatively slow (in comparison to the ear) fixation rate of the eye or simply a by-product of unfamiliarity with the medium, however the cause is currently unexplained. 

1 Comment
Iowa Gang link
24/2/2021 03:49:08 pm

Thanks great bloog

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    lindsay vickery

    test version

    Categories

    All

    Archives

    September 2020
    October 2019
    September 2018
    August 2018
    March 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    May 2016
    April 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly